Perhaps potential buyers saw through Sotheby’s attempts to gloss over provenance issues with phrases like “this magnificent, century-old collection” and the “Collection has been widely exhibited and published.” Sotheby’s can claim a small victory for having sold the two highest estimated lots. However, in the end 165 of 313 lots failed and the sale will likely be judged a mess.Vignette: Jus' saying...
A blog commenting on various aspects of the private collecting and trade in archaeological artefacts today and their effect on the archaeological record.
"antiquities with dubious provenance dont sell" and antiquities with a great provenance sell very well as the recent sale of antiquities from the higgins armoury museum showed.sold by thomas del-mar at 25 blythe road some pieces selling for 20-30 times the estimates.i was bidding on this one,
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thomasdelmar.com/Catalogues/as200313/lot0110.html
estimate 1-2k sold for 38k [my bid was blown out of the water]thats what a good solid provenance does.
kyri.
Interesting. If you'd won, would you have had the holes in the crown infilled? Not sure I like the cracks of the cheekpieces.
ReplyDeletehi paul,the condition of all the helmets was very bad.when i examined lot 112 i was scared the cheekpieces were going to fall off.i must admit,i would have had it restored.personally i think the provenance is what drove the prices sky high.
ReplyDeletekyri.
hi paul,the condition of all the helmets was very bad.when i examined lot 112 i was scared the cheekpieces were going to fall off.i must admit,i would have had it restored.personally i think the provenance is what drove the prices sky high.
ReplyDeletekyri.