Waiting wife (1881) |
Eight years ago Robbins (2012, pp 86-8) was looking at this question and found that nearly 90% of artefact hunters in England and Wales go out metal detecting at least once a week and over 10% of her survey respondents stated that they detect more than three times a week. Another 10% only detect one weekend a month, amounting to 24 days per year. When out detecting, her survey results show that detectorists spend an average of 5 hours 30 minutes searching for artefacts while a survey of 84 magazine articles, which together detail 466 separate detecting events, gives an alternative figure of 6 hours 15 minutes per visit.
It seems that the metal detecting forum results reflect the upper end of that 90%, probably those the feel they have something to boast about. Extrapolating from Robbins' figures and these, it would seem that 80% of detectorists go out artefact hunting between 2 and 7 hours a week, 10% less than 1.4 hours a week, and 10% much more than 7.
Eighty percent of 27000 detectorists is 21,600 of them, if most of them average about 5 hours in the field a week over nine months that's a whopping 3,888,000 hours detecting a year (!). On top of that are the more-than-10-hours-a-week crowd (2700 @ 10 hrs x 36 = 922,000 hours a year). Even if the low end seekers find nothing, the total annual hourly figure for the other 90% is somewhere around 4,810,000. And yet the mere handing in of 80000 recordable finds a year from the whole lot is taken to mean "the majority are responsible". That's one find for every 60 hours detecting. So according to the average, a detectorist finds one recordable find every ten/twelve weeks. Yes? Or are they finding MUCH more, and simply not handing it in?
Lest anyone says your figures are too high Paul:
ReplyDeleteYou say a detectorist finds one recordable find every ten/twelve weeks.
By contrast, The English Heritage/CBA survey indicated an average of about 0.99 of an artefact each per week (and both the Kevmar and Connolly surveys suggested much the same thing!)