UFOlogist Malanga answers Under-Pyramid Scan Questioners

              Corrado Malanga 'explains'               
 

Italian Giza researcher Corrado Malanga answers debunkers who claim that SAR technology can only scan the surface, laying out the techniques behind the new 'discoveries' on the Giza Plateau (nine parts). Pt. 1/9 . This rather disjointed auto-dub of an already ramplbling explanation starts off with the kind of argument that raises a red flag for me: "it is very simple, a small child would understand it" - belittling those who do not understand what he's saying. This is a typical ploy of  pseudoscience. 

The fact is however that what Prof Malanga says is very disorganised and rambling, not to mention inconsistent. If the whole idea is to turn "photonic" (eh?) into "sonic" information, why does he then talk of analysing it in terms of "pixels"? In any case if one starts with crude photonic data, how does the conversion into another form of output in some way ADD the subtlety (we understand lacking in the photonic output - otherwise there would be no need to convert it to analyse it) that allows underground resonances and vibrations to be read? This continues to be unexplained. 

Another issue I have is that the idea of a tomographic slice through a site in which you can see "pixels" in front and behind the plane completely ignores what the basic definition of a tomographic slice actually is (Greek τόμος tomos, "slice, section"/ γράφω graphō, here "describe" ). 

This explanation (together with the personal attacks on the project's critics) obscures much more than it reveals, and calls into question Malaga's ability to explain it, and indeed his motives for giving this unfocussed justification involving special pleading. 

Get the method and results properly published so they can be discussed. So far, the way it is being presented, promoted and defended looks to me like it is a total scam. Prove me wrong.