Monday, 6 March 2017

CPAC Meets Again



In Trump's Washington, the next CPAC meeting (with new members and under the aegis of a fundamentally weakened DoS) will be to review proposed extensions of the Belize, Guatemala, Mali cultural property agreements. No doubt Cultural Property Observer will be there promoting his usual 'first found' and 'guard the sites instead of the market' views. 

From the Donkey's Own Mouth


US orange-handed loot
buyers have their say
Over on a dealers' lobbyist's blog in Trumplandia, is an ever-so-revealing comment: 
Michael Davis said...
In light of the current administration's expressed interest in cutting aid to foreign governments, I hope they will recognize MOUs as effectively shifting the enforcement cost of source countries' internal laws onto the backs of U.S. taxpayers and small businesses.
So who should pay to keep smuggled coins off the US market? What 'costs' does not buying smuggled and undocumented artefacts involve for dealers? That the potentially dodgy stuff is cheaper?

Saturday, 4 March 2017

First drone footage after Syrian backed forces retake Palmyra.


First drone footage after Syrian backed forces retake Palmyra. Exclusive Ruptly drone footage released on Saturday shows the ancient ruins of Palmyra, two days after the Syrian Arab Army (SAA), backed by the Russian Air Force, liberated the historic city from ISIL.


Posted on You Tube by Ruptly TV 4 mar 2017

so this is the second time ISIL have been in control of Palmyra. the first time there were traces of blowing things up, but few looters' holes/ spoilheaps. Can you spot any here? I cannot (but it should be noted that this footage does not show the cemetery areas).

UPDATE 4th March 2017

Reutwers, 'Less damage to ancient Palmyra than feared, Syrian antiquities chief says' Fri Mar 3, 2017
Fears of a new assault on Palmyra's heritage [had been] raised after pictures in January showed the group had destroyed parts of the Tetrapylon, one of the city's most iconic monuments, and the facade of the second-century Roman Theatre. They had already destroyed other landmarks, including a 1,800-year-old monumental arch, during their first occupation of the city which ended a year ago last March. But Abdulkarim said preliminary photographs and video from the city showed almost no further damage than what was already known. [...] Some of the damage could be repaired, he said. "Except for the previous destruction, the state of the theatre looks good," Abdulkarim said. "Even that destroyed section could be repaired. It had already been restored, and it will be again."

Thursday, 2 March 2017

By any Other name...


Quote from a new book out (“Three Stones Make a Wall: The Story of Archaeology,” by Dr. Eric H. Cline):

\
This goes for the UK too, except they call it by another name, they call it 'metal detecting' (sic). This term is preferred to calling a spade a spade. Not calling it Collection-Driven Exploitation of the Archaeological Record, which is what it is, absolves everyone - archaeologists and academics too - from the onerous task of discussing what to do about it. I challenge my reader to find a SINGLE supporter of the Portable Antiquities Scheme (no matter whether they are in Bloomsbury at the time or not) who can explain any other reason why we do not call Collection Driven Exploitation of the Archaeological Record by a name which describeds more exactly what it is and what it is focussed on. Can you? I bet you will not.

So Cline's quote could be modified: "Right now we are seeing the greatest prevalence of collective shutting our eyes to collection-driven exploitation of archaeological sites that has ever been experienced". And that is something we should not, cannot, agree to.


Metaldetecting, Doh




On a metal detecting blog near you we meet this example of why there is absolutely no point trying to treat all metal detectorists as 'partners'. Most of them simply cannot cut the mustard conceptually:
The publication of the so-called Nighthawking Report, undertaken by Oxford Archaeology (OA) at a cost of £60,000 was the best thing that’ happened to the hobby [of collection-driven exploitation of the archaeological record]  in years. This influential report exposed ‘Nighthawking’ in the UK as being almost non-existent. The report confirmed that alleged looting incidents averaged out at less than two a month; but only if one assumes (without hard evidence) the holes in archaeological sites were indeed dug by rouge detectorists; though the more probable explanation being the natural, nightly doings of badgers, rabbits, and the like. The report was effectively, a kick in the teeth for metal detecting’s opponents.
Except the problem is not whether illegal artefact hunting is occurring, because we all know it is - all over the world. The problem is whether collection-driven exploitation opf the archaeological record is something which we should be encouraging, or something we should be striving to stamp out, like bird egging and elephant ivory. But of course very few metal detectorists are able to grasp the connection, or grasp anything much actually.

 

Taking Liberties witjh a Special Relationship






Huddled masses are coming back and taking our history
It looks like the US blog owner missed this comment posted a while ago. Pretty typical of artefact hunters not to have a decent answer to questions like these:

response to “Hoiking With Chicago Ron…

  1. Paul Barford
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.  
    Tell me, your current administration is busy building a wall and passing executive orders to keep immigrants out of your country. What makes you think you have the right to walk into another country like that and just walk off with bits of its history?
    Are ALL of the finds which Chicago Ron’s pals have taken throughout the years responsibly recorded on Britain’s Portable Antiquities Scheme database? Can we have the number of Stan Fleck’s brooch please? Who pays for the records of the finds now in Florida to be made? These finds all jumbled up in a single ‘zip top bag’, I guess – since you do not say – do they have individual findspot details accompanying each of them for the PAS records?



Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Statue Stolen from Berlin Store Turns up in UK


 A late sixth or early fifth century BC Etruscan bronze statuette portraying a warrior with lance and helmet entered Berlin’s state collection in 1860 and was exhibited along with other ancient bronze objects for some eighty years in Berlin's Altes Museum. On the outbreak of the War in 1939 to protect it from bomb damage it was packed and stored in a secure location. Unfortunately it was one of a number of objects stolen in the chaotic aftermath of the Fall of Berlin in 1945. At the end of the war 'some of these storage places were unprotected and there were incidents of theft by civilians and Allied personnel', according to Martin Maischberger, the deputy director of Berlin State Museums’ antiquities collection. This story does however have a happy end, due to the sharp eyes of an unnamed member of the staff of the British Museum which seems to be playing an increasing role as the watchdog of the British antiquities market (Catherine Hickley, 'Ancient bronze statuette lost after the Second World War returns to Berlin' The Art Newspaper 1 March 2017).:
The bronze was part of an English private collection and sold at auction in 2015. It was later consigned to the London art dealership Oliver Forge and Brendan Lynch Ltd. After Forge consulted an expert at the British Museum who identified the statuette as missing from the Berlin antiquities collection, the consigner agreed to return it. Berlin State Museums paid a small fee “as compensation, not the full market value,” Maischberger says. 
Unfortunately, this was not an isolated theft from the museum stores, there are many more conflict antiquities out there from the same source. The Berlin collections are still missing thousands of pieces that disappeared at the end of the Second World War. A few years ago I blogged about an Assyrian gold plaque  in the private hands of the Flamenbaum family in America.(this eventually was apparently rather gracelessly returned after a long court battle). Some objects plundered from the Berlin collections have ended up in Russian museums. The arts newspaper article also notes that:
A partner warrior bronze that also vanished after the war has been located in the university museum in Bochum in western Germany. The Berlin antiquities collection is in talks to recover it, Maischberger says.
 
Creative Commons License
Ten utwór jest dostępny na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Unported.