A blog commenting on various aspects of the private collecting and trade in archaeological artefacts today and their effect on the archaeological record.
Wednesday 12 August 2009
New blog
There is a new blog entitled Antiquities News & Topical Debate. Its author is Eftis Paraskevaides. Blogging thoughts on portable antiquities issues seems to be becoming very popular among collectors and dealers these days.
I have personal favourable experience of the "Israel policy" through Cyprus, where I was born and where I inherited a nice collection of ancient art. A few years ago Cyprus declared an "amnesty" and simultaneous registration of all antiquities in private hands. The Cyprus example worked well - all antiquities in private hands were legitimized by the state whilst at the same time providing the state archaeologists with details of all ancient art in private hands. It also means that illegally excavated antiquities can no longer legitimately appear in private collections in the future as they would not possess a registration. Everybody wins - the state archaeologist can then ask permission to study specific antiquities in private collections - a request rarely declined by the collector, who knows that in so doing he is not risking the loss or confiscation of the object. For example my late father had a beautiful decorated picrolite bronze age bowl in his collection which will be the subject of academic study. I was also encouraged to give permission to students to visit and study some of the objects - I see no problem with this.
A similar policy is required in the UK, but sadly I fear that some academics may be too narrow minded to allow an amnesty, even if this means many important artifacts coming to light...
I am interested on your views on this subject. Regards, eftis.blogspot.com
This really should have gone under the previous post: http://paul-barford.blogspot.com/2009/08/portable-antiquities-reporting-scheme.html
A similar policy is required in the UK, but sadly I fear that some academics may be too narrow minded to allow an amnesty, even if this means many important artifacts coming to light...
I find that a very odd statement. There is indeed a scheme for recording archaeological material held in private collections in the UK, it is called the Portable Antiquities Scheme and I am sure you will find that your local Finds Liaison Officer (Elizabeth Gill if I am not mistaken) is anything but “narrow minded”.
British archaeologist living and working in Warsaw, Poland. Since the early 1990s (or even longer) a primary interest has been research on artefact hunting and collecting and the market in portable antiquities in the international context and their effect on the archaeological record.
"coiney" - a term I use for private collector of dug up ancient coins, particularly a member of the Moneta-L forum or the ACCG
"heap-of-artefacts-on-a-table-collecting" the term rather speaks for itself, an accumulation of loose artefacts with no attempt to link each item with documented origins. Most often used to refer to metal detectorists (ice-cream tubs-full) and ancient coin collectors (Roman coins sold in aggregated bulk lots)
"tekkie" - metal detectorist/metal detecting (a form of artefact hunting)
CDE - Collection-Driven Exploitation of archaeological sites
CPAC - Cultural Property Advisory Committee [US]
FLO - Finds Liaison Officer (post in the PAS)
HER - Historic Environment Record [UK]
IAPN - International Association of Professional Numismatists
MENA - Middle East and North Africa
PAS - Portable Antiquities Scheme
PNG - Professional Numismatists' Guild
UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNESCO 1970 Convention - Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property
2 comments:
Dear Paul,
I have personal favourable experience of the "Israel policy" through Cyprus, where I was born and where I inherited a nice collection of ancient art. A few years ago Cyprus declared an "amnesty" and simultaneous registration of all antiquities in private hands. The Cyprus example worked well - all antiquities in private hands were legitimized by the state whilst at the same time providing the state archaeologists with details of all ancient art in private hands. It also means that illegally excavated antiquities can no longer legitimately appear in private collections in the future as they would not possess a registration. Everybody wins - the state archaeologist can then ask permission to study specific antiquities in private collections - a request rarely declined by the collector, who knows that in so doing he is not risking the loss or confiscation of the object. For example my late father had a beautiful decorated picrolite bronze age bowl in his collection which will be the subject of academic study. I was also encouraged to give permission to students to visit and study some of the objects - I see no problem with this.
A similar policy is required in the UK, but sadly I fear that some academics may be too narrow minded to allow an amnesty, even if this means many important artifacts coming to light...
I am interested on your views on this subject.
Regards,
eftis.blogspot.com
This really should have gone under the previous post:
http://paul-barford.blogspot.com/2009/08/portable-antiquities-reporting-scheme.html
A similar policy is required in the UK, but sadly I fear that some academics may be too narrow minded to allow an amnesty, even if this means many important artifacts coming to light...
I find that a very odd statement. There is indeed a scheme for recording archaeological material held in private collections in the UK, it is called the Portable Antiquities Scheme and I am sure you will find that your local Finds Liaison Officer (Elizabeth Gill if I am not mistaken) is anything but “narrow minded”.
Post a Comment