CNBC |
Buyer: a***b (160) (Private listing) Past monthAh, so they do have documentation of the origin? Even for the ones from Afghanistan? So why not say that in the sales offer? Or is that the sort of lies that many antiquities dealers routinely fob their clients off with? Basically the rest of the feedback tells us more about the people that buy antiquities like that. They are (a) not at all fazed by being faced with a seller that blatantly declares in the wake of the takeover in Kabul that his stock comes from one of the most heavily-looted conflict zones in the Middle East with no attempt to explain away any legal/ethical pather by which he got it and (b), apart from the dugup coins [which seem to me likely to mostly be what he says they are], the rest of the material looks like the crudest most misshapen fakes you'll see this side of Katmandu. Almost every single person who bought one was dead sure they'd bought a real piece of antiquity straght from the Taliban. That shos just hom much they know. Who are these people, what do they want? As for a dealer that not only sells crap for inflated prices but makes a claim that irt's come from Afghanistan to boost its desirability, well, what can one say?
The top of the ring is not original.
Reply by ancientroman. Left within past month. Dear Buyer, we wish you would’ve contacted us regarding your concerns, we would’ve sorted out the issue promptly, we feel sorry that you may think that the top of the ring is not original, in that case we would’ve provided the necessary certification proving the authenticity and the origin of the ring, still we are sorry that you may feel this way we sincerely apologize and we hope we can make it up to you, As always customer Satisfaction is our number 1 priority.
No comments:
Post a Comment