W odpowiedzi doScum giving responsible detectorists a bad name, unfortunately like everything nowadays there's far too many people doing itPrzetłumacz Tweeta
"Not metal detectorists", what does that mean? I wonder, somebody who uses a metal detector (and be honest, a digging tool too) to remove hidden metal objects from the ground to take possession of them would be called a ... what, then? This is collection-driven exploitation of a site.
How do you do collection-driven exploitation of the archaeological record "responsibly"? Is that how (British, mainly) people used to go bird-egging "responsibly" before the law changed?
Vignette: Responsible bird egg collection, accurate resin replicas to serry into rows in a cabinet, fondle, ogle and show off, like collectors do.
UPDATE 11th April 2023
I don't understand your question
It is quite a simple one, how does one do collection-driven exploitation of the archaeological record "responsibly"?
It is a complex, fragile and finite resource. How would a private collector removing random items from it, altering it, depleting it, do so "responsibly"?
2 comments:
How would a private collector removing random items from it, altering it, depleting it, do so "responsibly"?
By conforming to the Code, which doesn't prohibit any of those things.
I don't think Mr Warren is a bit interested or capable of debating the issue at all reasonably.
Post a Comment