The Festival Of Archaeology fortnight Has Come to an End, Leaving Questions Unanswered

In Britain they have this cutesy "#FestivalOfArchaeology" publicity stunt where all sorts of events are staged (some in the past involving "metal detecting" - ugh) anyway this year it lasted a fortnight. At the beginning there was an "ask an Archaeologists a question" session, the idea of this bit of public outreach being that members of the publlic could ask a real archaeologist a real question about real archaeology and they'd get an answer. Hmmm. Cute eh? Possibly they were catering just for the type of "what-do-you-do-when-it-rains?" or "do-you-find-much-gold?" type questions. Anyway since at the moment public archaeology is somewhat in competition with the Graham-Hancock-youTube "ancient lost civilization" take on the past (the popular Netflix series "Ancient Apocalypse" got a lot more viewers than anything actual archaeology has to show). I thought I'd see how British archaeology would cope with a Hancockian question or two. So here's one:

Paul Barford @PortantIssues ·Jul 19
#AskAnArchaeologist, What is being done in Britain to make available to the public the results of any current projects with relevance to the question of the existence of the possible Lost Ancient Proto-Civilization discussed in the popular Netflix docuseries #AncientApocalypse?

and the answer was revealing on just where public archaeology is going in Britain today....

I asked another one, a bit more specific, about the British evidence for that famed Younger Dryas Impact that you can read about in the Internet. I put a picture on this one, and the question is quite specific - and the answer would give the opportunity to explain a number of methodological issues (and the title's got "diamonds" in it):

Paul Barford @PortantIssues ·Jul 19
#AskAnArchaeologist, there is material claimed as representing a Younger Dryas Comet Impact (c. 12.9kya) at Watcombe Bottom, IoW, what is its archaeological context & is there more research in material of this nature in Britain? https://researchgate.net/publication/268390328_Nanodiamond-Rich_Layer_Across_Three_Continents_Consistent_with_Major_Cosmic_Impact_at_12800_Cal_BP 

So, whether or not Britain feels part of Europe any more, the whole of Britain and "Doggerland") are right in the centre of the shadow to the east of the effects of this claimed cosmic catastrophe - obviously something very significant to the prehistory and "story of our land", no?   So the answer to this question is pretty symptomatic too on the ability of British archaeologists to present to the public their side of a story that for at least part of the public that is fascinated by the mysteries of the past is part of popular culture... 

Just in case I was just a little too subtle above... despite the fact that thousands of people believe what they are told by the "experts" like Graham Hancock and his YouTube imitators that archaeologists "have got it wrong", "have not got a clue", or (worse) "are hiding from us all the truth", neither question was answered by a British archaeologist. As far as I know, there has not been any widely-accessible official response (such as a website or page on their own website) by any British archaeological body or organization to "Ancient Apocalypse". They've just capitulated to this widespread public misinformation about the past. the same with the Younger Dryas nonsense. It does not matter that there ARE technical articles in the internet in journals like Nature saying the reasons why there was no "impact", it's all there, but is it accessible to the average Joe Public. Will my Brexit-supporting Mum get anything out of it if she reads it? (Answer, no). 

Quite apart from the duty we have to inform public opinion (or am I dreadfully out of touch here?) there is a more important practical reason why archaeology should not be letting this slide. If tens of thousands of members of the public (that potentially includes developers, various shades of "influencers", local government officials as well as Westminster lawmakers) are firm in their belief that archaeology is a (deceitful) scam that cannot provide real answers, them why will they be persuaded to support our work in any way at all? 

After all, a bloke with a metal detector can find as many "treasures" as a fully funded dig done with little brushes and sieves that mostly finds only charred grains and potsherds the size of a thumbnail. A bus driver with a YouTube channel can show (and solve) more "mysteries of the past" (big stones "nobody knows how they were moved, pictures of ancient Egyptian lightbulbs, Sassanian pots that look like batteries, carvings on standing stones that look like aliens, etc.) that archaeologists who just talk about abstractions.... 

British archaeologists have surrendered long ago to the artefact hunters and collectors with their metal detectors and spades. Here too they also show their innate passivity. 

Please, show that you can answer the question.