BBC: Metal detecting 'helping to preserve Britain's history'

.
I mentioned this the other day, now somebody has sent me a link (sadly not embeddable) to the BBC's Jenny Hill reporting (video).

"Metal detecting used to be seen as a slightly eccentric pastime but high-profile discoveries of long-lost treasure are giving it a new image. The amateur archaeologists are gaining respect as they are credited with playing an increasingly important role in helping us learn about the UK's past".

Well, how they are actually depicted as doing so is by emptying the archaeolocial record of its artefacts, and even getting their kids along to help. In the programme is featured Frank Andrusyk of the Central Yorkshire Metal Detecting Club (NB, no mention of the Code of Practice). There is mention of the Staffordshire Hoard (de rigeur these days), "a high profile discovery which boosted interest in the pastime". There is mention of an "official database' amateur archaeologists' finds can be recorded on - with 90 000 added last year - but nowhere do we learn its name, the bloke that represents it in the film is given the label "British Museum". So we see the mess on Michael Lewis' desk in the BM (and the national flag in the corner) as he gives a few glib soundbites about how metal detectorists are "not in it for the money". You may notice Bloomsbury Pete the heritage conscious pigeon in the background trying to listen in at the window so he can do the PAS' outreach for it next time a question too difficult for them to answer is asked (so that's about most questions innit?).

Apparently "a lot of people that go out metal detecting have a real genuine interest in the past" which somehow for the "British Museum" makes it all OK I guess. [People who shoot deer in the forests in Poland near me also say they are really interested in 'looking after' the deer, which is why they put out water troughs for them just in front of their hides, and when they come to drink... It's all legal].

Cut back to Frank-with-a-Slavic-Surname up in Yorkshire who explains that

"the people who just walk away with the items, it's such a shame, just such a shame. The true meaning of the metal detecting, from an 'istorical perspective is the, erm.. looking and searching for the information that those items contain".

At the end of the film the journalist stresses "for them its not about the monetary value of the find, the real treasure that lies beneath the earth here is what it can tell them about the past".

Well, I think we are not really much further on in the debate than in the mid 1970s when metal detector owners insisted on people stop using the term "Treasure hunters" and call them "metal detectorists", far more anorakish ("Metal detecting ... slightly eccentric pastime. - deliberate camoflage you see? They do not like it when you call a spade a spade and refer to them as "artefact hunters"). So now they apparently want us to call them "amateur archaeologists". Both the BBC and the British Museum jumble-desk-guy keep trying to convince us they are "not in it for the money" (now what was it that Terry Herbert the finder of the Staffordshire Hoards featured in the film told us he used to say when out detecting? Remind us please Mr Lewis)

Secondly we are not getting anywhere near getting that idea across about archaeological context are we? There is this database you see, and lots of finds get put on it. But the "find" is not the point of the database, EBay's got lots of finds on it. The database is there to make a permanent record of findspots of items that get - as Frank says "taken away, such a shame, such a shame". But Frank's appearance here is less than stellar as archaeological outreach ... what does he say? He says what is lost when things are taken away (from sites he's interested in?) is NOT the findspot information at all, but "the information that those items contain". In other words, he sees archaeological finds no differently from the US heaps-of-coins-don't-care-where-they-come-from-as-long-as-they-are-on-my-table collectors who claim to be able to write all of human history from fondling a pile of ancient pictured discs of metal. So-called "metal detecting" is of course exactly the same kind of collecting, except these collectors hoik their own collectables from the soil and discard what they do not want, while the coineys across the Atlantic pay somebody else to do it (and pay somebody else to break the law to get it to them if necessary). When it comes down to it, and no matter what people in the PAS or anywhere else in Bloomsbury say, the two are manifestations of exactly the same hobby, all part of the same problem.

Not that the BBC would notice. But - and here's the question Heritage Action asked - who is telling them otherwise?