![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxGLLxhDhefaAOt1t-K-YpcKvEJDXE4DbemLen_iTlh9O_KhX-spUaEgKeSJ13KifnFjjAJ5AapKFi38_udmCg7cMPKpOoB-XPORkZl11iZ5ft__-zGgneDPy1BWPfu52Q_bZMGKlsZoL2/s200/eye1.jpg)
Such MOU's (sic) are only supposed to be decided after a formal request from a State Party to the State Department. CPAC is then supposed to make recommendations to the President's designee at the Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, who in turn is only supposed to agree to import restrictions if specific statutory criteria are met.[...] If the reports emanating out of Egypt are true, its just more evidence that the whole CPAC process is but a bad joke.Yes, the way the United States of America "implements" the 1970 Convention is indeed a bad 1980s joke. A very bad and damaging joke, given the voracity of the US no-questions-asked market for antiquities. It's good to see some evidence that the US is at last changing its attitude to the cultural property rest of the world. Probably dealers like the ACCG have done their part in bringing home just how much damage can be done to international relations by continuing to ignore the problem.
In any case, Tompa is being misleading when he says that such measures always need CPAC input, emergency regulations do not, do they? Anyway, the Cultural Property Research Institute (sic) is already on the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment