What we are discussing in reality Is this "Responsible" if the artefact hunters show some of the artefacts that they've removed, and say which hole they came from and how far down, and then look after them nicely? I think not (Fifa, Jordan 2016) |
The second and third paragraphs relate what Thomas and Pitblado assert to what Kersel has determined from collectors and artefact hunters actually on the ground, about their motivations and attitudes. She also questions how T and P define "stewards" (and collectors).
She then addresses the fundamental question that Thomas and Pitblado ignore (I'd put the word "responsible" in inverted commas there):
we should also ask whether the responsible and responsive acquisition of artefacts—by stewards or collectors—causes harm [...] In In the Holy Land and in the UK, ongoing demand for both legal and illegal objects can and does result in the ruin of archaeological landscapes. While Thomas and Pitblado are correct to advocate for greater collaboration with responsible and responsive stewards and collectors, this engagement must be one that highlights the clear connection between demand for artefacts and the destruction of archaeological sites and objects. .and the information they provide when not treated as loose collectable commodities.
No comments:
Post a Comment