Monday, 27 January 2025

Outrage in Romania about Theft of Iconic Ancient Romanian Artefacts from 'Negligent' Dutch Museum

The theft of archaeological masterpieces of major cultural importance for Romania, lent by the Romanian National History Museum (MNIR) to the Drents Museum in the Netherlands, has prompted heated debates and controversies in Romania related to the procedures followed by MNIR, by other Romanian authorities involved in the process, and by Drents Museum ( Iulian Ernst. ' Theft of iconic Romanian ancient artifacts from Dutch museum prompts heated debate' Romania Insider 27 January 2025

On the one hand, it is questioned why originals of such value were sent to a relatively minor Dutch museum without proper insurance (EUR 30 million for the entire collection, out of which EUR 5.8 million for the stolen items), and on the other hand, the Dutch museum is suspected of insufficient security measures.

A famous ceremonial helmet dating 450 B.C., known as the Coțofenești helmet, and three Dacian bracelets dating around 50 B.C., all made of gold, were stolen on the night of January 24 to 25 from the Dacia - Empire of Gold and Silver exhibition hosted by Drents Museum in Assen, which included around 673 archaeological objects made of precious metals.

"Multiple individuals," according to the Dutch Police, after consulting the CCTV, used dynamite to enter the museum, took the artifacts, and left the place in three minutes. No human guard was assured by the Dutch museum, despite the immense value of the objects in the exhibition and, according to MNIR, despite the clauses of the contract signed between parties.

"I assure you that the insurer [of the exhibition] has done all the necessary research to ensure that the heritage is properly preserved during the exhibition," said the MNIR director Ernest Târnoveanu in a press conference on January 26 when asked about the security measures provided for the exhibition. However, he also said that "there is no human guard at night," speaking of the security of the exhibition at the Assen Museum. Moreover, he stated that MNIR would sue Drents Museum if the contractual obligations regarding 24/7 surveillance of the exhibition were not observed - and he implied this was the case.
The DUTCH Mueum apparently asserts that the contract only obliges the institution to "ensure 24/7 surveillance" and therefore contract has no clause requiring the empty building full of that much gold should have human guards at night. It is not clear who alerted the police to the explosions, and – the police itself is inexplicably vague on this. The formulation of their statement: "at approximately 03:45 AM, the Dutch police received a report of an explosion at the Drents Museum on the Brink in Assen. Upon arrival, it became clear that access to the building had been gained by forcing a door with explosives" seems to suggest that the Drents Museum had not secured proper surveillance that would have allowed it to provide the police with real-time information.
Amid high political tensions, the event has been exploited by nationalist opposition in Romania, which pointed to the otherwise visible discrepancy between the value of the exhibition sent to the Netherlands and the value of the insurance, the contracts and agreements, and the insufficient security secured by the Dutch museum.

Several politicians [...] accused the Romanian authorities of negligence and criticized the fact that the gold heritage objects were taken out of the country and taken to a museum in the Netherlands without adequate security measures to be exhibited.

Meanwhile, a crisis cell was established by the Romanian government in the case of the theft of the Dacian treasure. Romania will send a team of forensic experts to the Netherlands, and the Control Body will go to the Ministry of Culture to verify the entire process of organizing the exhibition at the Drents Museum.


No comments:

 
Creative Commons License
Ten utwór jest dostępny na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Unported.