The ACCG has lots of practice at flogging dead horses, or wasting their members' money to try to do it. "The same US District Court judge who ruled for the State Department in the ACCG-IAPN-PNG FOIA case has again ruled for the government on the remaining issues on remand from the D.C. Circuit" ('District Court Again Accepts State Secrecy Claims; But Transparency Needed More than Ever' CPO, June 14, 2012). Of course Lobboblogger manages to append a conspiracy theory to that too. And if the Judge would only read the documents submitted, the Conspiracy would be revealed...Vignette: The new ACCG fundraising drive, available to Guild members for $15.99.
.jpg)
2 comments:
I don't really understand your point. You condemn the ACCG for undertaking work at the direction of the US Court of Appeals that had remanded the matter to the District Court, but in another post done today, you seem to applaud the Government's second motion for reconsideration in the SLAM case. Talk about flogging a dead horse....
The point is that the ACCG is wrong.
Post a Comment