Tuesday 19 February 2013

Will the study of archaeology soon become a thing of the past?


Michael Braddick (professor and pro-vice-chancellor for the faculty of arts and humanities at the University of Sheffield) ass:
'Will the study of archaeology soon become a thing of the past?" Guardian (Higher Education Supplement, Feb 19th 2013. 
Certainly the current emphasis in archaeology's misguided "outreach" focussing merely on the glittery gold-and-silver (with its antiquitist fascination with narrativisation of loose decontextualised artefacts found by non-archaeologists with metal detectors) will do nothing to aid real British archaeology in  defending itself from Philistine cuts. Perhaps it deserves its inevitable fate.

2 comments:

Cultural Property Observer said...

Actually, archaeology will need more outreach with programs like PAS to remain relevant. Why should anyone support a couse of study that only benefits and caters to a select few?

Paul Barford said...

It seems "Cultural Property Observer" has completely misunderstood what I said, but in doing so illustrated perfectly my point. Insted of seeing archaeology, CPO sees "relevance" in the "narrativisation of loose decontextualised artefacts" which is a TOTALLY different thing from real archaeology.

I think the Philistine will consider that on the surface many academic academic disciplines "only benefit and cater to a select few" (molecular biology, quantum physics, Latin philology, ethnography, ethology etc. etc).

Obviously I am of the opinion that archaeology, properly done, is of wider social and cultural (and more general) benefit than the antiquitist invention of stories about artefacts based on extra-source information and speculation. That is no more than mythmaking (which is not to deny the latter a role too in various contexts).

 
Creative Commons License
Ten utwór jest dostępny na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Unported.