BM promotes looting by another name |
“The trustees of the British Museum have become the world’s largest receivers of stolen property, and the great majority of their loot is not even on public display.” [...] He criticised “encyclopaedic museums” such as the British Museum, the Louvre in Paris and the Metropolitan in New York that “lock up the precious legacy of other lands, stolen from their people by wars of aggression, theft and duplicity”. [...] He writes: “This is a time for humility – something the British, still yearning for the era when they ruled the world, ie for Brexit, do not do very well.
A string of carefully-constructed lies and half- truths is of course what the same institution concocts for continued support of Britain's lootier lassez faire antiquities legislation and collection-driven exploitation of the archaeological record. The parallel goes deeper:
A British Museum spokeswoman [...] said the Elgin marbles were acquired legally, with the approval of the Ottoman authorities of the day. “They were not acquired as a result of conflict or violence. Lord Elgin’s activities were thoroughly investigated by a parliamentary select committee in 1816 and found to be entirely legal” she said.Maybe it's time to take a second look, not just the "it's legal innit?" arguments of other British looters.
Geoffrey Robertson's 'Who Owns History? Elgin’s Loot and the Case for Returning Plundered Treasure' will be published on 5 November by Biteback
No comments:
Post a Comment