
President Kaczynski, commentators reminded us was very aware of the role of the nation's history in cementing the bonds within society. He was the initiator of several initiatives in this regard, most notably the innovative museum to the Warsaw Uprising. As a Pole involved in the history-writing of the region, one might have reservations, even many reservations, as a professional to the brands of public history that society accepts. That is in the nature of the debate which is fundamental to modern historiography, which is not only permissable but desirable. What is not at all desirable however is a group of outsiders, a commercial interest group attempting to dictate what we or any other foreign nation should regard as our history, dressing their attempts to thrust their own wishes, their own pseudo-histories on other nations, trying to mask their own commercial greed, as some form of "superior" ideology called "cultural property Internationalism" which attempts to negate the rights of communities to claim the cultural heritage of the region where they live as their own. How dare they? Just who do these collectors think they are?
Photo: Pawel Kopczynski, Reuters
2 comments:
How dare YOU limit cultural identity in such a way? Who or what gives you the right or authority to dictate the limits and bounderies of cultural identity and heritage? The days of segregation are long past, you claim to be an archaeologist, but that is no reason for you to live in a bubble in time.
Umm, I live here? What an extraordinary comment to make.
What "identity" would somebody like you want to take on buying illegally exported cultural property from a "source country" like mine?
Post a Comment