"I find it supremely amusing that they cannot grasp (or pretend not to grasp) the uncomfortable fact that possibly - just ever so possibly - opposition to their cavalier and destructive approach to a heritage that belongs to the general public might come from anyone other than only an archaeologist. But admitting that would of course ruin their constructed fallacy that the general public is represented (and their interests best served) by a few self-centred dealers and collectors rather than ALL thinking people (not just archaeologists) concerned about preserving the record of history".
Monday 7 October 2013
Whose Past is It? Who Cares?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment