National Geographic insists that all the artefacts dug up by the team they sent to Eastern Europe to dig up wartime "Nazis" were sent to museums Is that the case? When was this filming secretly done? Questions surely must be raised by this thread: a thread "Ground Dug in Latvia" on the "wehrmacht-awards.com" forum started by Craig Gottlieb ( 06-11-2013, 07:09 AM #1 note: now listed as 'Expelled') boasting:
Friday, 28 March 2014
Nazi War Digger Brings Back 'Ground dug in Latvia' Helmet: "No Trouble With Customs"
National Geographic insists that all the artefacts dug up by the team they sent to Eastern Europe to dig up wartime "Nazis" were sent to museums Is that the case? When was this filming secretly done? Questions surely must be raised by this thread: a thread "Ground Dug in Latvia" on the "wehrmacht-awards.com" forum started by Craig Gottlieb ( 06-11-2013, 07:09 AM #1 note: now listed as 'Expelled') boasting:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
And 'I was told by my friend Stephen'. I wonder who that could be... (or his new friends from his time there, etc., etc., etc.). Good find!
I'm trying to understand your interest in this subject. WWII relics do not fit the UNESCO definition of cultural property because they are not 100 years of age. I can see the concern if human remains are also uncovered. In that case, one would hope the authorities and/or the German and Russian Embassies would be notified. However, let's assume as is probably the case, that is not the typical situation. Please explain why you are making such an issue of metal detectorists finding this material. Do you maintain valuable context is being lost, finding and preserving it somehow glorifies Nazism or perhaps Communism or is it something else? Just trying to understand where you are coming from.
CPO, it may be difficult for you to comprehend, but there are those of us who see heritage issues as a little bit more than narrowly proscribed by a blinkered view of the CCPIA...
This is very much connected with notions of "relics", their collection, what they are 'for' (Gotlieb).
A major issue for me here is the involvement of UK metal detectorists, and what PAS negligence of discussion of "best practice" can lead to. It's one thing to allow trashing of sites in the UK, it's quite another to take those lackadaisical attitudes to another country.
Post a Comment