What on earth is the PAS playing at? Why are they selectively hiding information? They are behaving like a now-you-see-it, now-you-don't metal detecting forum (which is not by any means meant as a compliment). Why are they manipulating data by selectively hiding them instead of making them available for public scrutiny? Why can we not count on even a modicum of transparency from the state-funded organization charged with making Britain's artefact hunters behave more transparently. Bring back Dr Drost's records please. The public who pay through the nose for them deserve to be able to see them !
TAKE A GOOD LOOK at this behaviour, for these are precisely the sort of people that want to grab more and more millions of public quid to make artefact hunters into the "partners" of the British Museum, and to whom they want us all to entrust oversight of the exploitation of the archaeological record. Take a good look and decide what you think about that as a "policy".
2 comments:
Hmmm, so they've indulged in some funny business to get to a million after 17 years? By contrast, by lunchtime today the Erosion Counter will click to a fifth of that number since the start of just this year!
(And every single click open to full public scrutiny and never rationally challenged!)
Why not ban dealing in British antiquities totally as in Denmark,Poland etc. Also,ebay needs tackling urgently. They have no care about provenence or authenticity. Fake coins,metal arrowheads,freshly knapped flint arrowheads. The thing is some are very good fakes and if for some reason they got into the record,couldnt this create a massive problem?
Post a Comment