Collectors just love the cute pre-columbian figurines, not so keen on other cultural artefacts so they cannot legitimately claim to be 'studying the [whole] past' through the objects they buy. An odd surface on this one to my eyes. |
There is often a surprising overlap between the highly specialized criminal worlds of artifact and art theft and the underworld heavyweights in the drug trade [...] theft of cultural products can be directly tied to drug trafficking, as a way to launder drug money - as may have occurred in this case - or as collateral in drug deals, since works of art are relatively easy to smuggle and valuable on international markets. [...] even as a standalone crime, the theft and trafficking of ancient artifacts and valuable works of art is a widespread and lucrative trade. [...] Once trafficked, stolen cultural pieces are difficult to reclaim because of a lack of adequate legislation in some countries, and buyers who claim ignorance.That's because they deliberately refrain from asking any questions. The no-questions-asked market and the people that participate in it are the real problem.
'Spain sends ancient treasures back to Colombia' BBC, 1 September 2014
Marguerite Cawley, 'Artifact Smuggling Case Shows Links Between Drugs and Culture' Insight Tuesday, 02 September 2014
The 'Insight' piece interestingly links the story with 'Donna Tartt's 2013 Pulitzer Prize winning novel "The Goldfinch," in
which "a youth removes a famous work of art from the wreckage of a
bombed museum and the painting is later traded between international
drug dealers". They also suggest that "in Mexico,
the theft of religious artifacts has become an important earner for
criminal groups that have diversified their activities, with 42 percent of such thefts reportedly linked to organized crime".
Marguerite Cawley, 'Artifact Smuggling Case Shows Links Between Drugs and Culture' Insight Tuesday, 02 September 2014
Pre-columbian druggie? |
No comments:
Post a Comment