
Monday, 30 September 2013
Keep Spinning it Out... Baltimore Coins Test Case one Big Yawn

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A blog commenting on various aspects of the private collecting and trade in archaeological artefacts today and their effect on the archaeological record.
3 comments:
I suppose the more times they can submit the same cut-and-paste nonsense (keeping interest up with posts in the same vein on the same lawyer's Cultural Property Observer blog), the more money the ACCG's lawyers can take from dealers and collectors supporting this shameful case.
Well if this is as insubstantial as you and your fellow archaeo-blogger claim, why not provide a link to the papers of the Government and ACCG and let your readers decide:
http://www.accg.us/News/Item/Guild_Files_Amended_Answer.aspx
[there is no link on the ACCG page to the government answer which the amended document makes invalid].
So, as a matter of interest, did Bailey and Ehrenberg charge coin collectors a lot to cut-and-past the new document from the old one with the addition of the "embargo" idea and a few of the conspiracy theory bits from CPO?
It's a shame the ACCG's legal team did not get the document right first time and save a bit of time and money.
Let us get this embarrassing spectacle over with, so the ACCG can get involved in worthier things.
Post a Comment